Friday, August 12, 2022

Shrimps and worms were among the first animals to recover after the largest mass extinction

The study revealed how life in the sea recovered from the event.

Biodiversity was significantly reduced during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, as may be seen especially in the body fossils of animals with complete skeletons. Both skeletonized and soft-bodied creatures can provide evidence to help us understand how entire ecosystems were impacted by the crisis and regenerated after it.

In a new study, scientists from China, the USA, and the UK, reveal how life in the sea recovered from the event. They found that bottom burrowing animals were among the first to bounce back after the end-Permian mass extinction.

Scientists examined trails and caves on the South China sea bed. They could piece together sea life’s revival by pinpointing what animal activity was happening and when.

Professor Michael Benton from the University of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences, a collaborator on the new paper, said: “The end-Permian mass extinction and the recovery of life in the Early Triassic are very well documented throughout South China.”

“We were able to look at trace fossils from 26 sections through the entire series of events, representing seven million crucial years, and showing details at 400 sampling points; we finally reconstructed the recovery stages of all animals, including benthos, nekton, as well as these soft-bodied burrowing animals in the ocean.”

Dr. Xueqian Feng from the China University of Geosciences in Wuhan led the study, focusing on ancient burrows and trails. He explained: “Trace fossils such as trails and burrows document mostly soft-bodied animals in the sea. Most of these soft-bodied animals had no or poor skeletons.

“There are some amazing localities in South China where we find huge numbers of beautifully preserved trace fossils, and the details can show infaunal ecosystem engineering behaviors, as well as their feedback effects on biodiversity of skeletonized animals.”

Professor Zhong-Qiang Chen, director of the study, said: “The trace fossils show us when and where soft-bodied, burrowing animals flourished in this Early Triassic greenhouse world.

“For example, elevated temperatures and extended anoxia coincided with low values of behavioral and ecologic diversities across the Permian-Triassic boundary. It took about 3 million years for ecological recovery of soft-bodied animals to match the pre-extinction levels.”

Professor David Bottjer, a collaborator in the study from the University of Southern California, added: “One of the most remarkable aspects of the South China data is the breadth of ancient environments we could sample.”

“Differential responses of infaunal ecosystems to variable environmental controls may have played a significant but little appreciated evolutionary and ecologic role in the recovery in the hot Early Triassic ocean.”

Dr. Chunmei Su, another collaborator, said: “The mass extinction killed over 90 percent of species on Earth, and we see that in the catastrophic reduction in ecological function of the surviving animals in the ocean.”

“At first, there were only a few survivors, and recovery began in deeper waters. The recovery of nekton occurred simultaneously as the full rebound of infaunal ecosystem engineering activities.”

Alison Cribb, a collaborator in the study from the University of Southern California, added: “The first animals to recover were deposit feeders such as worms and shrimps. The recovery of suspension feeders such as brachiopods, bryozoans, and many bivalves took much longer.”

“Maybe the deposit feeders were making such a mess of the seafloor that the water was polluted with mud, the churned mud meant suspension feeders could not properly settle on the seafloor, or the muddy water produced by those deposit feeders just clogged the filtering structures of suspension feeders and prohibited them from feeding efficiently.”

Professor Chen added: “And some animals, such as corals, had disappeared completely. Coral reefs did not return until much later.”

Dr. Feng concludes: “Why does it matter to understand these great mass extinctions of the geological past?”

“The answer is that the end-Permian crisis — which was so devastating to life on Earth — was caused by global warming and ocean acidification, but trace-making animals may be selected against by the environment in a way that skeletal organisms were not.”

“Our trace fossil data reveals soft-bodied animals’ resilience to high CO2 and warming. These ecosystem engineers may have played a role in benthic ecosystem recovery after severe mass extinctions, potentially, for example, triggering the evolutionary innovations and radiations in the Early Triassic.”

Journal Reference:

  1. Xueqian Feng, Zhong-Qiang Chen, et al. Resilience of infaunal ecosystems during the Early Triassic greenhouse Earth. Science Advances, 2022; 8 (26) DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0597
EXPLORE MORE

New Inventions

TRENDING