According to the general theory of relativity, time is a continuous quantity, one that can move slower or faster, depending on acceleration and gravity conditions.

Be that as it may, quantum mechanics theories recommend that time ticks away at a steady pace, similar to the frames of a film being played out. In this situation, time must be all-inclusive. For both hypotheses to be correct, this contradiction must be clarified objectively.

A few theories have recommended that one potential clarification for the obvious inconsistency is that time can be quantized as spacetime, like hypotheses depicting quantum gravity. In such a situation, spacetime isn’t described as consistent, however, it is rather partitioned into smaller units, which would by need to relate to the Planck length. This is, obviously, excessively small to be recognizable.

The hypothesis would likewise necessitate that such discrete packets of time would each terminate. This situation proposes there would need to be a universal clock that ticks away at a very small unit of time. What’s more, under this situation, universal time would exist all through the universe and collaborate with the matter. It additionally raises the question of how fast would such a clock tick.

In this new effort, a trio of theoretical physicists at the Pennsylvania State University has calculated the upper limit for the possible quantization of timeâ€”they suggest 10âˆ’33 seconds as the upper limit for the period of a universal oscillator.

The theorists have developed a theory to describe the upper limit of such an increment. In their model, they suggest that a universal clock would be a quantum oscillator that regularly switches between two states.

To calculate its pace, they envisioned it as being coupled with a slower oscillator similar to an atomic clock. In their model, they envisioned the net energy of the two oscillators as always being the same.

In this scenario, the two oscillations would have to desynchronize over time. And the theorists used that divergence as a way to calculate the upper limit for the tick of the universal clock.

They even suggest that despite an inability to measure such a short tick, it should be possible to verify their theory by instead attempting to measure the desynchronization of the two oscillations.

##### Journal Reference:

- Garrett Wendel et al. Physical Implications of a Fundamental Period of Time, Physical Review Letters (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.241301