For decades, physicists have hunted for clues on the quark’s tendency to slow down in larger atoms, but have come up empty-handed. Now, a massive team of physicists known as the CLAS Collaboration (after the CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer) has taken a closer look at old data has finally revealed a clue to explain this strange phenomenon.
They found that there is a possible link between correlated protons and neutrons in the nucleus and a 35-year-old mystery. The discovery has prompted the extraction of a universal function that portrays the EMC Effect, the once-stunning revelation that quarks inside nuclei have lower average momenta than anticipated, and supports an explanation for the effect.
Discovered just over 35 years ago, the EMC effect is the surprising observation that the cross section for deep inelastic scattering from an atomic nucleus is different from that of the same number of free protons and neutrons. This effect was first observed in 1983 at CERN by the European Muon Collaboration. The collaboration found that when they measured quarks inside a nucleus, they appeared different from those found in free protons and neutrons.
Douglas Higinbotham, a Jefferson Lab staff scientist said, “There are currently two main models that describe this effect. One model is that all protons and neutrons in a nucleus [and thus their quarks] are modified and they are all modified the same way.”
“The other model, which is the one that we focus on in this paper, is different. It says that many protons and neutrons are behaving as if they are free, while others are involved in short-range correlations and are highly modified.”
Short-range correlations are brief associations shaped among protons and neutrons inside the core. At the point when a proton and a neutron pair up in a connection, their structures overlap quickly. The overlap lasts just before the particles go separate ways.
The universal modification function was developed from a careful re-analysis of data from an experiment conducted in 2004 using Jefferson Lab’s Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, a DOE Office of Science User Facility. CEBAF produced a 5.01 GeV beam of electrons to probe nuclei of carbon, aluminum, iron, and lead as compared to deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen containing a proton and neutron in its nucleus).
When the authors compared the data from each of these nuclei to deuterium, they saw the same pattern emerge. The nuclear physicists derived from this information a universal modification function for short-range correlations in nuclei. They then applied the function to the nuclei used in measurements of the EMC Effect, and they found that it was the same across all measured nuclei that they considered.
Barak Schmookler, a former MIT graduate student and now Stony Brook University postdoctoral scientist who led this research effort said, “Now we have this function, where we have neutron-proton short-range correlated pairs, and we believe that it can describe the EMC Effect.”
“We think what’s going on is that the roughly 20 percent of the nucleons in a nucleus’s correlated pairs at any one time have an out-sized effect on measurements of the EMC Effect.”
“We think that when protons and neutrons inside the nucleus overlap in what we call short-range correlated pairs, the quarks have more room to maneuver, and therefore, move more slowly than they would in a free proton or neutron.”
Axel Schmidt, an MIT postdoctoral fellow, and co-author said, “The picture before this model is that all protons and neutrons when they are stuck together in a nucleus, all of their quarks start to slow down. And what this model suggests is that most protons and neutrons carry on like nothing’s changed, and it’s the select protons and neutrons that are in these pairs that really have a significant change to their quarks.”
Higinbotham said, “Whether or not this detailed picture of what’s happening in the nucleus can be confirmed, for now, the universal modification function does seem to tie all of the elements of this mystery together in a self-consistent way.”
“So, we’ve shown that pairs are pairs and they behave the same way, whether they are in a lead or a carbon nucleus. We’ve also shown that when the number of pairs is different because they are in different nuclei, they are still collectively acting in basically the same way. So what we think we’ve found is that with one physical picture, we can explain both the EMC Effect and short-range correlations.”
On the off chance that it holds up, that physical picture of short-range correlation as the reason for the EMC Effect likewise achieves another progression toward a long-lasting objective of nuclear and particle physicists to interface our two distinct perspectives on the atom’s nucleus: as it is comprised of protons and neutrons, versus as it is comprised of their constituent quarks.
The nuclear physicists have already begun working on the next step in confirming this new hypothesis, which is to measure the quark structure of protons engaged in short-range correlations and compare that with un-correlated protons.
“The next thing we’re going to do is an experiment that we’re running in Jefferson Lab’s Experimental Hall B with the Back-Angle Neutron Detector. It will measure the proton when it’s in deuterium and moving at different speeds. So, we want to compare slow- and fast-moving protons” says Lawrence Weinstein, a lead co-author and Professor & Eminent Scholar at Old Dominion University. “That experiment will get enough data to answer the question. This one points strongly to an answer, but it’s not definitive.”
Beyond that, the next goal of the collaboration is to begin considering how short-range correlations and the EMC Effect may be researched further at a future potential electron-ion collider. The collaboration is now working on a project to determine the best way to accomplish that goal, using funds provided by Jefferson Lab’s Lab-Directed R&D program.
The study has been published in the journal Nature.